History of Iridology
History of Iridology
Based on Foreign text by unknown authors, compiled by Leo Bongaards ND
Hipocrates ( 480 – 360 BC) is said to have used the eyes for diagnosis and the Aztecs practiced some form of eye diagnosis around 1000 BC, Stone carvings show the use of the eye for purpose of determining illness. The Egyptians and Babylonians most likely used iridology and the Chinese and Japanese are said to have used the varying colours of the iris as part of their diagnosis.
The bible, one of the
You have no idea how many times I’ve heard people say,”I just wish to write a composition for you,” and then a few minutes later they say,”Thank you but no thanks,” and that is one of the worst things you can say to essay helper somebody who’s hoping to get your attention. They do not understand what you’re going through when you are working so hard on your paper. They really don’t understand how to create, although they want you wish to be supportive and to have the best experience possible. Below are some facts to consider before you give up on trying to compose an essay for me.
oldest books, states “The light of the body is the eye if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light; but if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness; if therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness” (Matthew 6:22, 23; Luke 11:34). Or a loose translation “Your eyes are the LIGHT of your body, when your eyes are good the whole body is full of light, when your eye are bad the body is in full darkness”
Philippus Meyens(Phillipe May de Fransconie) was the first in modern history to publish a work on iridology named Chiromantia medica.
This was in 1670 in Dresden, Germany, this book made an interesting study of iris signs and its relation to illnesses and had a small map of the Iris with respective areas of some parts of the human body. Next was Johann Sigmund Eltzholtz (Nürnberg, 1695), who expanded on the studies of Meyens.
In 1813 the Viennese optician Beer wrote about iris diagnosis: “Everything which affects the organism effect the iris, it cannot not remain without effecting the eye, and in reverse”.
R.Schnabel 1882-1962 is the most well-known representative of scientific eye diagnosis. He wrote three books concerning iris diagnosis.
Then, almost a century later, in Göttingen, Christian Haertls, who based his findings on the studies of Meyens and Eltzholtz, launches a controversial and important work and in 1786 an other German, Doctor Härtels, published ‘de oculo et signo’, “The eye signs”
However it was the Hungarian physician Ignatz von Peczely (1822-1911) that made Iridology known in Europe.
According to history, (now viewed as a fable) von Peczely only a boy than, caught an owl and broke it’s leg in the trap Looking in the owls eye, he saw a fine trace appear in the inferior region of the corresponding Iris of the owl. The young von Peczely was curious about the marking that appeared. He nursed the owl to good health and noticed that the trace in the Iris virtually disappeared, to leave only one very tenuous mark. He studied other authors’ works on the subject and when Peczely became a physician he developed his knowledge even more and was able to do comparative research in hospitals.
He made many discoveries and in 1881, after many difficulties, he launched his first work (Entdeckungen auf dem Gebiete der Natur- und Heilkunde – Anleitung zum Studium der Diagnose aus dem Auge). Rather a mouth full meaning. “Discovery In Natural History And Medical Science, A Guide To The Study And Diagnosis From The Eye”.
Many works on the subject have appeared later in Europe, mainly in Germany. The priest Emanuel Felke (1856-1926) made iridology more popular still and Iridology spread throughout the whole of Europe. Heinrich HENSE lived from 1868 to 1955 and was a pupil of minister Felke, while Mrs Von Wad had a college in Dresden teaching Iridology.
In the beginning of the decade around 1900 Iridology was introduced in the United States by Dr. Nils Liljequist, a Swedish homeopath, who had noticed iris colour changes when he took medication, he may have exchanged information with von Peczely as they both worked on iris charts around the same time. It would be worth noting that 80% of the healing was done with homeopathic medicine in America at that time. It was only after allopathic doctors formed an association called “the AMA” and started to lobby politicians that slowly but surely homeopathy was replaced by allopathic medicine. IN 1904 Dr. Henry Lahn (Lane) born in Austria, writes the book “The diagnosis from the eye” in the USA. This publication makes iridology popular in the States. In more recent times it was a North American, Dr. Bernard Jensen, that developed the map of the Iris that is still in use all over the world. After Dr. Jensen’s passing his daughter in-law Ellen Tart-Jensen has revised and updated the chart. The French physician Professor Jossin, who is regarded as a pioneer of modern iridology, produced iris charts which are still in use today. The following names are also worth mentioning: To Dr. Kritzer, Farida Davidson, Harry wolf, Dorothy Hall and Paul Angeren, all well respected teachers of iridology.
Meanwhile without much knowledge in the West in Russia iridology has been practiced widely. Being cheap and quick this form of diagnosis must have appealed to the Russian institutions at the time. Bulgaria had its own Iridology master: “Petar Dimkov lived from1886 – 1981. He finished the military college in St Petersburg.
Despite receiving multiple gun shut wounds during the war he followed in the family tradition and practiced alternative medicine”- A book with his findings was published in 1998 and some unpublished works have been found, which may still be translated into English.
With communication being less restrictive now, much of the information and some charts of the former USSR have made it to the West.
Iridology was given a boost when In Germany between 1950 and 1954 when clinical studies on 640 patients were conducted by Dr. Walter Lang and Joseph Deck in the hospital in Karlsruhe under the supervision of Dr. Vida. The patients where diagnosed by iridology as well as by traditional means.
The reliability was found to be around 75% At that time. However a follow-up study found that in the next 5 years 95% of the findings had eventuated!
1.But in Holland the “Rijksuniversiteit (State University) Limburg” found that there was no relationship between markings in the iris and the presence of gall stones. The iridologists in this trial could not diagnose the gallstones in the patients. In the USA a study was conducted that included Bernhard Jensen. He also fell into the trap when he was asked to diagnose Western medicine conditions and could not. Other negative findings: 2. Simon A and others. An evaluation of iridology. JAMA 242:1385-1387, 1979. 3. Cockburn DM. A study of the validity of iris diagnosis. Australian Journal of Optometry. 64:154-157, 1981. 4. Knipschild P. Looking for gall bladder disease in the patient’s iris. British Medical Journal 297:1578-1581, 1988. Most of these studies where designed in such a way that Apples and Oranges were compared. Iridology has limitations much the same as every other means of diagnosing. The iris shows nerve reflexes only, it can not be compared with chemical analysis of blood and urine. Some trauma to the body, done under anastatic may not show in the iris or the recording may be delayed. Some reports state that TB can be detected in the iris long before a test (for the Bacillus of Koch) will confirm the condition. Kidney problems may only be discovered when the patient complains about the pain. After investigation it may be found that 90% of the kidney is diseased. In the iris kidney deficiency is noted long before there is pain, nourishment of the organ may avoid or delay the 90% degeneration. Critics make much of the negative findings but one must remember that the iris mainly reveals tendencies to under or over activity, it records medical events, as parting of fibers, and it tells a lot about the constitution and inherited weaknesses of the person. The information can be used to prevent or delay major illnesses. On the other hand some have taken to interpreting the eyes in physiological tendencies; the Rayed method is on of these. By learning the lessons of a particular iris group or sub group we advance and overcome our physical problems, according to the Rayed study.
The very latest research in Italy by Dr. Daniele Lo Rito focuses on relationship issues, a Contemporary Analysis of the Inner Pupillary Border and then there is the time risk research by English scientist John Andrews claiming to have thousands of case studies. These are just a few of the on-going research projects into the secrets the eyes can reveal. Modern digital cameras make observations so much easier, the equipment can show individual fibres and record colour changes from visit to visit .
As practitioners we must observe and ask questions from our patients to learn more and more of this wonderful science.
If you have information about Iridology research, past or present in your native country please let me know so I can include it in this article. Leo Bongaards ND MH
- Reveal constitutional strength. Are we built strong or weak? How well do we endure stress?
- Reveal the health level.
- Reveal nutritional and chemical needs. What elements are lacking and where?
- Reveal location of environmentally obtained toxins.
- Reveal the quality of nerve force and what is the condition of the nervous system.
- Reveal the response to treatment, how fast the body heals and at what rate.
- Reveal over acid levels in the body.
- Reveal the whole body as a unified structure and it’s overall health.
- Iridology does not reveal disease names. Often there are situations and conditions that develop long before any symptoms appear in the disease process.
- It does not reveal operations performed under anaesthesia. Nerve impulses are short circuited under these conditions.
- It does not reveal pregnancy, because it is a normal bodily process.
- It does not reveal gallstones.
- It is not a psychic analysis.
- Iridology cannot tell what accident occurred but it can reveal which tissue was damaged.
- It cannot tell specific pathology in the body.
- It cannot pinpoint the location of parasites, germs or bacterial invasion. It does show the conditions of tissue and if it might be conducive to these invasions.